|
Is this the consensus from everyone? I
have it running on a test machine with a Pent 400 and it is slow with that.
But I would guess on a regular server with dual processors it would not be so
bad??? Thanks, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting I would say if you're users are NOT using web
messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided
to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically
a Lexus with a Yugo engine. Looks good but slow as molasses. So what is CURRENT
conceusus with the 2006 release? Does it work well enough to upgrade to
yet? |
- RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Mike Barber
- Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Matrosity Hosting
- RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Bruce Barnes
- Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Matrosity Hosting
- Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Martin Schaible
- RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions Bruce Barnes
- Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 permissions... Don Brown
- Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 permis... Martin Schaible
- [IMail Forum] Latest Consensu... Brian Hruska
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Matrosity Hosting
- RE: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Grant Griffith - IMail
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Matrosity Hosting
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Matrosity Hosting
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Martin Schaible
- RE: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Kevin Bilbee
- RE: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Richard Bowman
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Heimir Eidskrem
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Darin Cox
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Matrosity Hosting
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Darin Cox
- RE: [IMail Forum] Latest ... Kevin Bilbee
