That may be good for them but not for some of us that will not upgrade to 2006 until it is stable enough to use without causing problems for our clients. I have not renewed our SA and will not until the problems with 8.X are solved. The SMTP problem has been around for quite a long time and I just got tired of dealing with Ipswitch on it and did our own work around. If they won't fix the problem then we will be moving to another application.

Chris Moody wrote:
It can be argued that software developers might have a certain moral interest in patching their software if the vulnerability can be used to hurt others. Windows 95 is pretty long in tooth, and few systems are still running on Windows 95. Imail 8.x on the other hand is not even comparatively old to Windows 2000, and a great number of servers are still running that version of software. The real question is when is that line drawn in the sand. When should a product no longer be supported for patches? Ipswitch says it's as soon as a new version comes out. I am sure what they would like is a subscription model that keeps the cash rolling in, and that is almost what they have achieved.
    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *John T
    (Lists)
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:01 PM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

    So if a vulnerability is discovered in Windows 95, Microsoft
    should spend the time and resources developing a patch to fix it?

    What about all those software vendors that were using old style
    parallel port keys that became obsolete when Windows XP came out?
    Should those software vendors have been forced to provide entirely
    new versions of software and keys that were working perfectly fine
    under DOS 6.22 or Windows 3.1 for free?

    **John T**

    **eServices For You**

****
    **"Seek, and ye shall find!"**

    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jim F.
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:45 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

    >> The answer is obvious, time to drop Imail. <<

    The only problem is that the alternatives aren't exactly that
    great.  SmarterMail looks like a great product, but it's still
    lacking some of the fundamental elements of a corporate mail
    server like TLS.  They also remind me now of how IPswitch was 5 or
    6 years ago.  I'm afraid that if I jump ship to SM, in a few
    years they'll start going down the same over-priced,
    feature-bloated, performance-lacking, unstability-ridden road that
    Ipswitch (and Declude) did.  I've looked at the other alternative
    products and none are really that viable IMO.

    I would love it if there were a full featured Open Source mail
    server.  Not that I am looking to save money - I'd just like to be
    able to use a product that is driven by functionality instead of
    the bean counters.

    FWIW, I didn't renew my IMail service agreement that expired a
    month or two ago.  I'm not sure what I'm holding out for, but I
    don't want to feel like I'm being robbed by paying Ipswitch to use
    their product.  That said, I'm not using a version with a
    vulnerability in it, but that shouldn't matter.  If a
    vulnerability is discovered in any version of a piece of software,
    the vendor should provide a patch regardless of SA status.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Tyran
    Ormond
    *Sent:* Monday, October 23, 2006 6:17 PM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

    On 05:41 PM 10/23/2006 -0400, it would appear that Mike N wrote:

    Now that there's been an SMTP exploit released (yesterday) for the
    recently patched SMTP bug, you are running on borrowed time until
    someone decides to try it on your server.


    Stay with possibly exploitable version of the server or upgrade to
    a feature and bug rich version that doesn't have the exploit?  The
    answer is obvious, time to drop Imail.  It's been a long run (7
    years) but the handwriting is clearly on the wall.


    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Troy D. Hilton <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    Subject: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?

    Weve been running Imail 7.15 for a few years now and its been
    running very well. Well, its time to renew my SA with Ipswitch
    but Im wondering is it worth it?



    In following this list I see that the latest versions of Imail
    have been far from stellar, so Im know I will not be upgrading to
    2006.x anytime soon. I think Ive seen that 8.22 is pretty stable
    but is it worth the upgrade from a 7.15 thats old but stable, to
    a 8.22? Is it worth it for me to spend the money for an SA for Imail?



    Opinions?


    Tyran Ormond
    Programmer/LAN Administrator
    Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
    List Archive:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
    Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses courtesy of Netslyder, 
Inc.(http://www.netslyder.net)]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to