I wouldnt bet the farm on its results. Sure it probly tells you that your not doing 
things the way that alot of DNS admins do but in the grand scheme it doesnt really 
matter as long as it is performing the duteis that it is supposed to. One thing in 
particular is alot of DNS checkers will frown upon using a serial number that does not 
use the date format in it. Does that stop your dns from resolving queries? No it most 
certainly doesnt and another no no is using an A record to serve for more than one 
hostname but if your running virtual hosting then that is exactly what you want to do 
no matter what it says.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Sherwyn
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: DNS advice-Len special! :)


Hey Len:

Is DNS Expert what you'd rec'd for someone who's just been thrust into
handling our DNS duties?

I use Sam Spade to help me at this point, but sometimes I have a question
that I need help on. I do search the web dns sites and read thru material I
find, but I'd really like to have something to help check things over and
"troubleshoot", etc.

Using FBLI DNS Software for both pri and sec (but usually edit the zone
files myself with Notepad lately)  :>)

Question Example:  (as long as I'm here)

If an IP has 2 A records associate with it, is it the first one listed in
the reverse record file taht will always show up?  Like if AOL does a
reverse on acs3.cyberbounty.com it gets adserver.cyberbounty.com,  I just
changed it to list acs3.cyberbounty.com as the first record, adserver
second.  Whats the rule for this?

Thanks,,,

Randy
Ft. Myers, FL
Home of "Voting For Dummies"


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 2:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Recommendations for offering free e-mail?
>
>
>
> >I have a Dual PentiumIII 733, with 100 gigs Raid 5,
>
> RAID5 is the wrong RAID for mail I/O. It's the slowest RAID, esp when
> writing 100's of 1000's of smallish files to the mailq, maillog file,
> and mailboxes.
>
> Switch to RAID 0 + 1, striping across disks for speed and mirrored
> disks for redundancy.
>
> Use one disk channel(s) for the mailbox storage and another disk
> channel for the mailq/maillog actvity.  And use 128 megs on-board
> disk cache.
>
> Len
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>

Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to