> I've  never  understood  why  some people on the list are hostile to
> questions  that  people  post  when they can simple choose to ignore
> them if they don't want to answer the question.

Call  me  crazy,  but  I believe technical support personnel should be
able  to  work  independently  when  time and information allows. If a
knowledgebase   article   or  archived  post  is  publicly  available,
especially  one from just last week, answering such queries spoils the
poster  and  distorts  our  shared  responsibility to consult existing
support sources before escalating the issue to community "R&D."

In  this  particular case, Ben suggested that he had been watching the
list  for  a  solution  for  some time (which I find hard to believe).
However,  if  his issue had appeared urgent, it is likely that I would
have regurgitated the answer to save him time.

> I   agree  that  people  should  make  an  effort  to  find  answers
> themselves,  but why do you feel the need to even respond if you are
> not going to post an answer?

I *did* post an answer: "FAQ--RTA." That is *far* more useful than not
posting.  Without  that,  Ben  might  have  gone on believing that the
solution  remained  undiscovered;  instead,  he  knows it's solved and
where  to  look.  Would  you  suggest  that we cut-and-paste entire KB
articles,  instead of URLs?

In  addition,  logging  the  RTA  itself  in  the  archive gives later
searchers a reference point.

> We don't need the additional clutter to the list.

Any  time  you want to stay up all night "cluttering" somebody's Inbox
with job-saving information, just let me know.

I'm sorry, where was the answer in your post again?

-Sandy


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to