> Call  me  crazy,  but  I believe technical support personnel should be
> able  to  work  independently  when  time and information allows. If a
> knowledgebase   article   or  archived  post  is  publicly  available,
> especially  one from just last week, answering such queries spoils the
> poster  and  distorts  our  shared  responsibility to consult existing
> support sources before escalating the issue to community "R&D."

Generally I do that, but for some reason I could not get to the search page
to load for me. Maybe just bad timing when I looked. I assumed it would help
others if the answer was simply posted to the list. In interest of keeping
this list super moderated, I am sorry for my terse statement. I did not
think it would irritate someone so much. For most problems Google is my
friend. I am a searching fiend. Just could not access the archives when I
needed them. It just turned out the client was fine with only receiving
incoming mail for all accounts, so it was then a non-issue to me. Hence.. no
quick reason to look up the answer. Though I admit, it was irresponsible for
me to ask for it to be posted again when the archive search is working fine
now. Sorry!

> In  this  particular case, Ben suggested that he had been watching the
> list  for  a  solution  for  some time (which I find hard to believe).

How did I suggest that?
"If anyone has an idea of capturing all outgoing mail for a given host,
please post to this list."
And yes I have been on this list for awhile. I signed up in digest mode, but
instead I receive every message individually. I simply overlooked the answer
(or never received it... which is possible as I am getting fragmented
responses to other postings). I don't have the time to read each and every
message on this list. I simply overlooked the solution.

> However,  if  his issue had appeared urgent, it is likely that I would
> have regurgitated the answer to save him time.
>
> > I   agree  that  people  should  make  an  effort  to  find  answers
> > themselves,  but why do you feel the need to even respond if you are
> > not going to post an answer?
>
> I *did* post an answer: "FAQ--RTA." That is *far* more useful than not
> posting.  Without  that,  Ben  might  have  gone on believing that the
> solution  remained  undiscovered;  instead,  he  knows it's solved and
> where  to  look.  Would  you  suggest  that we cut-and-paste entire KB
> articles,  instead of URLs?

I appreciate the tip that it has been answered. If I need to refer to it, I
know I can find it. Thanks!

 > In  addition,  logging  the  RTA  itself  in  the  archive gives later
> searchers a reference point.
>
> > We don't need the additional clutter to the list.
>
> Any  time  you want to stay up all night "cluttering" somebody's Inbox
> with job-saving information, just let me know.
>
> I'm sorry, where was the answer in your post again?

Sorry for the additional clutter. I will be careful about posting again to
this list.

Ben



Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions:  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to