Some of our clients are so dependant on their email communications that they do NOT 
want to lose ANY message destined for them - and they really liked how Webshield would 
remove the viruses it found.

However, as stated earlier, we are now using Declude AV which does block the messages 
and sends appropriate notifications to the intended recipients.  These notification 
messages are the 'trigger' for my clients to contact the sender if they are interested 
to pursue the 'blocked' or 'lost' message.

Just a FWIW kind of observation, no debate :)

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:34:45 -0800

>> For what it's worth, we used NAIs WebShield (the SMTP virus scanner) 
>> and were pleased for the most part.  One of the nicest features is 
>> that it would 'clean' the message instead of simply blocking it.  On 
>> the downside, WebShield too often would hang and consume 100% CPU - 
>> which of course prevented it from receiving any more mail which is a 
>> really bad thing for a mail server to do!
>
>Let the debate begin.
>
>Why would anyone want to clean an infected e-mail and then deliver the clean
>version?
>
>I would guess that better than 95% of virus infected e-mails were sent by
>the virus itself and therefore would not be a legit message in any respect.
>
>John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
>IT Manager, Network Engineer
>RelianceSoft, Inc.
>Fullerton, CA  92835
>www.reliancesoft.com
>
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to