Here are a couple of tracert's and pings to show some info as well from my end.
Starting trace - Mar 14, 2003 13:24:01 Tracing to 216.150.152.46.... Hops IP Address RTT(ms) DNS Name 1 207.228.46.65 16 gw.davdgrp.com 2 207.228.13.130 16 davidgrp-loc.greatbasin.net 3 207.228.34.161 15 rno-core0-fe.greatbasin.net 4 157.130.232.25 16 Serial3-4.GW3.SCL1.ALTER.NET 5 152.63.114.178 15 143.at-6-0-0.XR3.SCL1.ALTER.NET 6 152.63.55.81 16 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.SCL1.ALTER.NET 7 152.63.0.253 15 0.so-4-0-0.TL1.SCL2.ALTER.NET 8 152.63.146.53 94 0.so-7-0-0.TL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET 9 152.63.1.50 94 0.so-3-1-0.XL1.NYC4.ALTER.NET 10 152.63.22.77 109 510.ATM6-0.GW12.NYC4.ALTER.NET 11 157.130.217.94 78 internap-gw2.customer.alter.net 12 216.52.95.5 94 border2.fe0-0-bbnet1.nym.pnap.net 13 216.52.91.22 94 easycgi-2.border2.nym.pnap.net 14 216.150.152.46 94 mail.easycgi.com Host reached Starting trace - Mar 14, 2003 13:24:58 Tracing to 216.150.152.46.... Hops IP Address RTT(ms) DNS Name 1 207.228.46.65 15 gw.davdgrp.com 2 207.228.13.130 16 davidgrp-loc.greatbasin.net 3 207.228.34.161 15 rno-core0-fe.greatbasin.net 4 157.130.232.25 16 Serial3-4.GW3.SCL1.ALTER.NET 5 152.63.114.178 16 143.at-6-0-0.XR3.SCL1.ALTER.NET 6 152.63.55.81 16 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.SCL1.ALTER.NET 7 152.63.0.253 16 0.so-4-0-0.TL1.SCL2.ALTER.NET 8 152.63.146.53 93 0.so-7-0-0.TL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET 9 152.63.1.50 94 0.so-3-1-0.XL1.NYC4.ALTER.NET 10 152.63.22.77 78 510.ATM6-0.GW12.NYC4.ALTER.NET 11 157.130.217.94 94 internap-gw2.customer.alter.net 12 216.52.95.5 78 border2.fe0-0-bbnet1.nym.pnap.net 13 216.52.91.22 141 easycgi-2.border2.nym.pnap.net 14 216.150.152.46 93 mail.easycgi.com Host reached AND dsome more ping stats: Starting ping - Mar 14, 2003 13:25:57 Pinging 216.150.152.46.... IP Address RTT(ms) TTL Bytes Received Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 391 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 422 115 12 TIMED OUT Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 TIMED OUT Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 109 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 125 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 109 115 12 Ping Successful 8 packets received out of 10 packets transmitted : 20% PACKET LOSS Round Trip Time (in milliseconds) Max/Min/Av: 422/94/179 Starting ping - Mar 14, 2003 13:26:45 Pinging 216.150.152.46.... IP Address RTT(ms) TTL Bytes Received Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 109 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 93 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 109 115 12 TIMED OUT Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 125 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 93 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 78 115 12 Ping Successful 9 packets received out of 10 packets transmitted : 10% PACKET LOSS Round Trip Time (in milliseconds) Max/Min/Av: 125/78/98 Pinging 216.150.152.46.... IP Address RTT(ms) TTL Bytes Received TIMED OUT Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 78 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 78 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 94 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 110 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 78 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 78 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 93 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 110 115 12 Returned Data: Pinging Host 216.150.152.46 79 115 12 Ping Successful 9 packets received out of 10 packets transmitted : 10% PACKET LOSS Round Trip Time (in milliseconds) Max/Min/Av: 110/78/88 Travis > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Len Conrad > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail processor problems - continued > > > Todd, here ya go, I ran mtr from San Antonio, and see packet losses and > large max delays at your end of the route, and I wonder what it would be > like for a list delivery? > > tx1.go2france.com Fri Mar 14 > 15:01:45 2003 > Keys: D - Display mode R - Restart statistics Q - Quit > Packets Pings > Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best > Avg Worst > 1. rrcs-sw-24-242-169-49.biz.rr.com 0% 423 423 1 > 0 0 2 > 2. 10.41.224.1 1% 420 423 8 > 8 13 54 > 3. cs2428129-101.satx.rr.com 1% 420 423 25 > 8 13 56 > 4. cs2428129-17.satx.rr.com 0% 423 423 20 > 8 14 55 > 5. srp80.snantx6000-rtr4.texas.rr.com 1% 420 423 10 > 8 13 50 > 6. 66.185.136.73 1% 421 423 14 > 13 18 119 > 7. bb1-hou-P0-0.atdn.net 1% 422 423 16 > 13 29 236 > 8. bb1-atm-P7-0.atdn.net 1% 420 423 48 > 33 50 250 > 9. pop1-atm-P0-0.atdn.net 1% 422 423 35 > 33 46 261 > 10. 144.232.8.209 1% 420 423 37 34 > 51 249 > 11. 144.232.12.13 0% 423 423 36 34 > 51 257 > 12. sl-bb20-nyc-10-0.sprintlink.net 1% 422 423 54 43 > 70 262 > 13. sl-bb12-nyc-9-0.sprintlink.net 0% 423 423 53 51 > 57 137 > 14. > sl-internap-73-0.sprintlink.net 2% 417 422 56 55 > 60 158 << > 15. > 209.191.128.149 1% 421 422 55 54 > 90 505 << > 16. > 64.74.61.198 2% 415 422 71 56 > 93 609 << > 17. > mail.easycgi.com 3% 411 422 71 57 > 85 492 << > > You've got the Ugly End of the stick! :)) > > packet losses should be less that 1% over many 1000's of iterations, ime. > > Len > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
