>> The IMail peer list just tells it which server to inquire with >> VRFY. There's no reason why any other server couldn't respond to >> that request...
Actually, there is a minor reason... > ok, good, then all the Imail peers could be told their only peer is the IP > of IMGate. ...the gateway just needs to have the "X1" signature in the 220 banner. > It's not a waste. Imail peering's traffic penalty could be comletely > removed by IMGate, if we can pin down the details. IMail peering's traffic can be shaped by IMail bridgeheads just as well. There's no need for a third-party MTA to do this, though the usual other benefits of using PostFix (envelope anti-spam, lower cost) would be felt. -Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
