Yes and the seem to refuse these common addresses:
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what is one to discern from that? Maybe it's a 'professional oversight'
on there part.
~Rick
>
> Also Expedia
>
> Received: from cluster.smtpout.expedia.com [207.46.182.249] by
> mydomain.com
> with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-8.03) id AB97DB0054; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:44:23 -0500
> Received: from [10.48.184.219] ([10.48.184.219]) by
> cluster.smtpout.expedia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3651);
> Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:44:21 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> >I just got done dealing with a livid client at the airport with his
> >laptop, who couldn't get on his plane because Imail spam blocked
> >delivery of his flight itinerary.
> >
> >expedia.com is (inexcusably) in the url blacklist.
>
> These kinds of send-only servers are also violating RFCs because they fail
> "sender address verification" (they reject bounce msgs for non-deliveries)
> and their IPs need to be whitelisted.
>
> Even if they don't ever look at inbound mail ( drop it in
> blackhole ), they
> should all accept inbound mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so SAV works.
>
> It's really inexecusable that these jerks, mostly corporate servers with
> supposedly "professional" mail admins, setup their "critical" envelope
> senders to reject inbound. One would think these admins would setup their
> mail servers with "best practices" to have the best chance of successful
> mail delivery, but no, they've screwed up badly, and screw up their
> $$$clients.
>
___________________________________________________________________
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
