I personally agree with the second depending on the tests. My view is why should I accept mail from people to don't setup their kit correctly? Especially it is something they can easily fix.
Like I say it depends on the test, but would like REJECT to be an open with Imail/Declude. That's my 2p anyway :) -----Original Message----- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 April 2004 15:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] AOL - Reverse DNS Rejections There are two camps in the anti-spam effort. One is that mail identified as spam is tagged and routed to the recipients spam folder. The other is simply rejecting the message at the mail server. This last method saves server resources and disk space but risks rejecting the occasional legitimate email (false positive) but a risk they are willing to take in view of the volume of junk mail being spewed. (52% of all mail is blocked on our mail servers as spam or junk mail and we receive email for 118 domains, filter it and then relay on to their mail servers.) With over 60,000 messages handles every day, we have had to only whitelist 21 email addresses. ************************************************ Email checked by UKsubnet anti-virus service To prevent email abuse & block spam contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44(0)8712360301 Web: www.uksubnet.net Fax: +44(0)8712360300 Powered by UKsubnet Internet Service Provider Business to Business Internet (ISP) ************************************************ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
