Hi Rod, > I'd add more disk, 160 meg just doesn't go as far as it once did :-) it's 160 GB, i pressed the wrong button...
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I almost forgot, that RAID5 is slow in writing data. As my instinct told me, i'll go for the blade server. I will use the good old compaq box as central log-server or as an additional web server. ============================================ Am Dienstag, 31. August 2004 um 00:30 schrieben Sie: > On Monday, August 30, 2004, 17:51:03, Pete McNeil wrote: >> On Monday, August 30, 2004, 4:43:05 PM, Martin wrote: MS>>> No Name Blade Server, 1 x P4 2,8 GHz, 2 GB RAM, MS>>> 2 S-ATA Disks 160 MB configured as RAID 1 > ^^ > ^^ >> It's just a hunch, but I would probably go with the blade server. > I'd add more disk, 160 meg just doesn't go as far as it once did :-) ============================================ -- Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen -------------------------------------------- Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 1 391 30 00 Fax: +41 1 391 32 49 Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 -------------------------------------------- News - Neue Produkte: .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer -------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
