I may be incorrect but someone will point this out. I believe that Raid 5 keeps on humming along while raid 1 requires a reboot of the server in the event of drive failure. Raid 5 should simply allow for a hot swap replacement of a drive and everyone's happy.
Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Server Type for IMail > Raid 5 will save your butt when a drive fails so you might rethink > that. > > Bill And Raid1 does not? Boy, some one sure does not like reading all the posts about poor performance with Raid5 vs. Raid1. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
