Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam

[Bill Foresman]

we're calling clamscan.exe not clamd Nick Hayer wrote: On 17 Dec 2004 at 11:12, Bill Foresman wrote: my dilemma is that Clam seems to catch more viruses This is probably a question that Declude Scott can answer but my first thought is ClamAV may be making false positives? but takes a LOT more CPU to run than Fprot. cland seems nearly equivalent in performance. Is that what you are using? I liked ClamAV 'cept for - on my systems - reliability. -Nick To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/