Scott,

Wow, I don't know what type of subscriber network rules that you had set up,
but I'm guessing that they were a lot different than mine. I don't know the
exact rules that Len uses, but am assuming that his set up is a lot closer
to mine than yours is/was. I have mostly relied upon DNSRBL lists of
subscriber networks and DUNs in the past, and have never had a single
complaint about legitimate mail being blocked or deleted using this as a
criteria. Blocking these Ips blocks and addresses has always been effective
for us, and I'm sure that most of the major ISPs are also using similar
criteria.

As far as whether or not mail gets through using "Scott's" weighting system,
it all depends upon how an admin has Declude or other rules tweaked. You are
always walking a tightrope between allowing spam to pass through unscathed
and completely deleting an e-mail when you rely upon a weighting system for
mail deletion. Unfortunately, it's an all or nothing proposition. At least
with rejection there is NEVER a chance of mail getting totally deleted, so
long as there is a valid return address.

Obviously, (to me at least) both methodologies have their place and their
own merits. In actual practice, both your numbers and Len's numbers seem
skewed at opposite ends of the spectrum, insofar as what amount of traffic
that comes from ADSL connections. Strangely enough, my numbers seem to fall
right in-between both of yours. Go figure. With the price of broadband
decreasing as it is though, I would tend to think that more and more
businesses will be able to afford T1 service in the future and more and more
residential customers (and zombies) will be adding to the ADSL numbers.


William Van Hefner
Network Administrator
Vantek Communications, Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Perry
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] reverse DNS
> 
> 
> 
> >Yes, it is possible to have a "legitimate" mail server set up on an 
> >ADSL line with a subscriber network RDNS. It is also theoretically 
> >possible to host a "legitimate" mail server on a dial-up 
> connection, on 
> >an open proxy, on a server with an open relay or on an IP range in 
> >China that has been blacklisted by every single DNSRBL in 
> the universe. 
> >There are all kinds of remote possibilities. I draw the line when 
> >99.9%+ of the traffic is spam.
> 
> When I last checked, a test showed that about 10%-15% of 
> legitimate E-mail 
> was coming from IPs that would have been blocked by a 
> "subscriber network" 
> test.  That was perhaps a year or two ago, however, so the 
> numbers may have 
> changed.
> 
> >At least with Imgate the odd legitimate sender receives 
> notice of the 
> >delivery failure, unlike with Scott's weighting system.
> 
> But with "Scott's weighting system", the E-mail goes through.
> 
> So you're comparing bouncing a legitimate E-mail with it being 
> delivered.  I know which I would pick.
> 
> >Anyone who goes the cheap route and routes all of their e-mail via a 
> >single MX on an ADSL connection without bothering to 
> configure RDNS is 
> >truly getting what they pay for.
> 
> It isn't always that easy.  In my case, the mailserver was in 
> a physical 
> location where switching from a business-class static IP 
> without vanity 
> reverse DNS to one with vanity reverse DNS would have cost 
> 10x the money.
> 
> >  If a company can't justify the money to spend on
> >at least getting a dedicated SDSL circuit or fractional T1, 
> then they 
> >really need to rethink their IT strategy.
> 
> That's the thinking that caused the dot com crash -- "Let's 
> spend $1,000 a 
> month instead of $100 a month so we can subsidize poor 
> anti-spam software."  :)
> 
> All I keep hearing is the same thing over and over -- "This 
> test blocks a 
> lot of spam."  Now that is great, but good anti-spam software 
> can block 
> just as much spam while allowing more legitimate E-mail through.
>                                                  -Scott
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> 


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to