On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 17:08, Mark Crispin wrote:
> Of course, the client command:
>       zz UID FETCH 10:4294967295
> is valid, although I wonder why the client went to that trouble instead
> of the more straightforward:
>       zz UID FETCH 10:*

Probably because client is trying to fetch only new mails it doesn't
know yet (last_known_uid+1:max). Of course, client should know about new
mails from UIDNEXT after SELECT or later with NOOP..

Well, there's also the mostly irrelevant race condition that if UID 10
was just expunged, 10:* would fetch the last undeleted mail.

Reply via email to