---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Leonardo Frassetto <[email protected]> Date: 2014-04-03 14:59 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [Imports] Sardinia Regional Dataset Building Import: second proposal To: Florian Fanselow <[email protected]>
Hi Florian, thanks for you answer. I think you're right, i'll add that tags to the one you suggested. I was a bit doubtful about the use of building:use but i see on taginfo that is well received (>400000 worldwide). Thanks! Leonardo 2014-04-03 14:53 GMT+02:00 Florian Fanselow <[email protected]>: Hi Leonardo, > > thanks for answering my questions! But now there are still some more^^ > > Do you use the Tagging-Tables, which are documented on > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Edificato , for the > import? If you do this, will there be any problems by adding an extra tag > 'building:use=' ? > So you can specify the official descriptions? > I don't know if I guess right, but IMHO the descriptions "edificio della > provincia" [0115], "edificio della regione" [0116] and "muncipio" [0113] > could be specified with the tag 'building:use=government'. Furthermore I > would add for all churches/chapels the tag 'building:use=religious' and for > schools and kindergartens 'building:use=education'. > > Some more suggestions are: > > stazione di polizia [0106] --> building=yes , amenity=police , > building:use=civic > > stazione pompieri [0108] --> building=yes , amenity=fire_station , > building:use=civic > > edificio ospedaliero [0118] --> building=yes , amenity=hospital , > building:use=medical > > edificio postale [0119] --> building=yes , amenity=post_office , > building:use=service > > tribunale [0123] --> building=yes , amenity=courthouse , building:use=civic > > I would use the simple 'building=yes', because in my opinion the key > 'building' should describe the type of the building and with 'building:use' > you can describe the use of a building. > > For gradinata del campo sportivo [02] in table 'Classe: 02 - MANUFATTI DI > IMPIANTI SPORTIVI (ST 02 TE 02 CL 02)' I would add additionally to the tag > 'building=yes' the tag 'building:use=sport'. > > If you want I can insert these suggestions on the wiki-page to discuss > them there. > > Regards > Florian > > > On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:50:42 +0200 > Leonardo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Florian! > > > > Thanks for all you advices but the data about the type > >of building is not present on that file. I'm sure that it > >exist on the Sardinian government office but they decided > >to not release it yet. If one day it wil be released we > >will add that information on the existing data. :) > > > > About the kindergarden i'm based on what is described > >here: > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dschool > > > > The building itself it's a school but the area will be > >tagged as amenity=kindergarten + isced:level=0. > > > > Regards, > > > > Leonardo > > > > Il 31/03/2014 10:15, Florian Fanselow ha scritto: > >> Hello Leonardo, > >> > >> I've read your proposal of the building import in > >>sardinia at the imports-mailing-list. That looks very > >>well, even if I don't speak italian ;-) > >> I'm especially interested in the part of > >>'how-to-translate-the-descriptions-into-the-tagging-scheme', > >>because I worked on this for the big data-import of > >>cologne > >> > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cologne/Adressimport > >> > >> In this tagging-table > >>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cologne/Adressimport/Nutzung > >>you can see, how we translated the (unfortunately german) > >>descriptions into the OSM-Tagging-Scheme. As you may see, > >>we have added the tag 'building:use' for nearly all of > >>the different buildings, so that the buildings are more > >>detailed. Maybe this is a tag you can add to your import? > >> I you want, I could do it for you! > >> > >> Further I have a question about the proposed tags of > >>'asilo'. I don't know the italian > >>school/kindergarten-system, so I wonder a little bit, why > >>you used the tag 'building=school' for an building that > >>belongs to a kindergarten. In my opinion it would be > >>better if you used 'building=yes' + > >>'amenity=kindergarten'. But that's just my german view. > >>Please correct me, if I have to edit my opinion ;-) > >> > >> Regards, > >> Florian > >> >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
