Thanks for the review! I’ve updated the final and sample datasets with updates based on your recommendations.
-Jonah > On Jun 15, 2019, at 7:46 AM, Max Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see you've put street/city/postcode address tags on small secondary > buildings (sheds and garages and the like). I don't see a need for > that. > > There's 420 occurrences of "addr:housenumber=0", which I wonder if > that is a placeholder or a real address part. > > Taking 301 Fort Lane as an example, it seems the conflation of > relations will have to be quite careful, as it appears that size rules > have been applied to objects that aren't buildings, there's courtyards > tagged as a sheds and buildings and a swimming pool with building and > address tags. > > Source tags can probably just go on the changesets. > > Also, consider using building=detached for detached houses, the > distinction doesn't particularly exist in US building data, but it's > something that can eventually exist. > > > Max > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
