Hi Jonah I did analysis of your OSM source file as of 2019-06-12 and detected some 15,500 buildings that deviate significantly from square angles buildings. It does not mean that they do not correspond to what is observed on imagery. But with a ratio of 32% of buildings with irregular angles, it would be good to look at these and see if they should be revised.
See Geojson visualisation on Github https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/Geojson_Visualisation_Building_Polygons_with_Irregular_Geometry.md#2019-06-12-city-of-portsmouth-virginia-building-footprints--addresses I only answer to the import list, since I dont susbcribe to the other lists plus avoid cross-posting . Pierre Le samedi 15 juin 2019 18 h 28 min 08 s UTC−4, Jonah Adkins <[email protected]> a écrit : Hi Pierre, Thanks for taking a look. The source data for this import is not AI derived - the state GIS office (VGIN) collects datasets from each city/county in Virginia, then processes them into a statewide dataset that is released (with a OSM compatible license) on a quarterly basis. Was there a particular area in the full or sample OSM files that looked bad? Thx-Jonah
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
