Hi Pierre - that’s pretty awesome! I verified the data came like that from the source, which is kind of a bummer. I ran some processes on the layer to straighten the angles out, and it appears to have helped,
The full and sample OSM files on GitHub have been updated. Thx -Jonah > On Jun 19, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Pierre Béland <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jonah > > I did analysis of your OSM source file as of 2019-06-12 and detected some > 15,500 buildings that deviate significantly from square angles buildings. It > does not mean that they do not correspond to what is observed on imagery. > But with a ratio of 32% of buildings with irregular angles, it would be good > to look at these and see if they should be revised. > > See Geojson visualisation on Github > https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/Geojson_Visualisation_Building_Polygons_with_Irregular_Geometry.md#2019-06-12-city-of-portsmouth-virginia-building-footprints--addresses > > <https://github.com/opendatalabrdc/OQ_Analysis/blob/master/Geojson_Visualisation_Building_Polygons_with_Irregular_Geometry.md#2019-06-12-city-of-portsmouth-virginia-building-footprints--addresses> > > I only answer to the import list, since I dont susbcribe to the other lists > plus avoid cross-posting . > > > Pierre > > > Le samedi 15 juin 2019 18 h 28 min 08 s UTC−4, Jonah Adkins > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi Pierre, Thanks for taking a look. > > The source data for this import is not AI derived - the state GIS office > (VGIN) collects datasets from each city/county in Virginia, then processes > them into a statewide dataset that is released (with a OSM compatible > license) on a quarterly basis. > > Was there a particular area in the full or sample OSM files that looked bad? > > Thx > -Jonah
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
