Hi, sorry by the delay, About the 3rd point (…the reused information is not altered or the meaning is distorted…), what do we understand by alter the data? Change the name of a stret from capital letter to a small letter? Complete an abbreviation? Adjust the location of a point, from the middle of a junction to the building where it’s located? Or change a pharmacy to a supermarket?
In the first cases, yes, they are the changes that we have contemplated for the data. The last case, no, and it is what we understand refers to the prohibition. About the 1st point (The reuse of public information is free and not subject to restrictions, except in the cases in which, by regulatory means, it is subject to obtaining a Creative Commons recognition license, due to the protection of other rights or legal assets, or the previous request of the interested party). in the case of pharmacies, the owner of the data is the Generalitat itself, the autonomous government that distributes it on its open data portal. We understand that it’s not necessary to request another additional permission. It would be different if the Generalitat were distributing the data of a third party, such as the college of pharmacists. Finally, as the colleague comments, from the open data portal itself they have congratulated us for reusing their data: https://twitter.com/opendatacat/status/1239094637488410625 “Molt bona feina @OSMcatala #farmàcies en #dadesobertes . El portal http://dadesobertes.gencat.cat us permet fer un treball col.laboratiu i molt útil per a la societat durant aquests dies #joemquedoacasa #FrenarLaCorba” Translation: “Very good job @OSMcatala #farmàcies in #dadesobertes. The portal http://dadesobertes.gencat.cat allows you to do a collaborative and very useful work for society these days #joemquedoacasa #FrenarLaCorba” Where farmàcies = pharmacies // dadesobertes = open data // joemquedoacasa = I stay home // FrenarLaCorba = slow down the curve El lun., 16 mar. 2020 a las 16:09, Mateusz Konieczny via Imports (< [email protected]>) escribió: > While I understand why you thought that ignoring > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines was a good idea, > it appears that you used source on incompatible license. > > Is there a plan to revert edits using this source and get data released > on a compatible license? > > Or maybe automatic translation was faulty? > > Mar 15, 2020, 15:51 by [email protected]: > > I got email that > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ACarta_OpenStreetMap.pdf > is supposed to describe licensing situation of data already being imported. > > I run it through automatic translate, > > "3. It must be ensured that in the reuse process the content of the > reused information is not altered" > > appears to be forbidding changing data what would make it incompatible > with ODBL. > > Is automatic translation wrong here? > > Also, point 1 mentions that parts of dataset are CC-BY licenced. Have you > confirmed > that it is not affecting pharmacy data? > > Mar 15, 2020, 15:03 by [email protected]: > > > > > Mar 15, 2020, 10:35 by [email protected]: > > we have decided to start it without delay. > > What is the license of the data? Can you translate text from > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Catalunya_Pharmacies_Import#License > image? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
