Alan said:
> I vote for Klint's suggestion. I'd personally use option #3
> to reject more spam and to cause valid email senders to follow the
> standards.
>
> If we are going to allow up front rejection, it makes the most sense to
> incorporate it into smtprcv.
More like "have to". Filters like TF can't do a up-front rejection, because
they process the mail only after it is fully received.
Randy.
This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
Rock Solid Software (tm)
