Guilherme O Lima wrote:
> SPF seems to have a very widespread adoption right now.
>
> Even the W3C has deployed it. See at http://www.w3.org/Mail/spf
>
> Are there any plans for a new version of SMTPRCV or TrashFinder
> supporting SPF?
I don't like to pre-announce new features, especially right now when my real
work is rather crushing. But SPF is on my radar screen (and has been for a
while).
I believe that we'll want SPF support in both TF and SMTPRCV, as you only
would want to block messages at the door that failed the SPF check. Ones
from sites that don't have SPF records that are dubious (using the "assumed"
SPF record) probably ought to be quarantined (i.e. trashed). And SPF results
should be taken into account when blocking mail addresses (if a mail address
of a spam has an SPF record, then we know it isn't faked, and we can be more
aggressive about blocking it if it is a source of spam).
Randy.
This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
Rock Solid Software (tm)
