I agree with the Apache Software Foundation. For now, let's just forget about Sender ID and concentrate on SPF!
Guilherme ----- Original Message ----- From: "Klint Gore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 8:47 PM Subject: Re: SPF in SMTPRCV > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:01:22 -0600, "Randy Brukardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guilherme O Lima wrote: > > > > > SPF seems to have a very widespread adoption right now. > > > > > > Even the W3C has deployed it. See at http://www.w3.org/Mail/spf > > > > > > Are there any plans for a new version of SMTPRCV or TrashFinder > > > supporting SPF? > > > > I don't like to pre-announce new features, especially right now when my real > > work is rather crushing. But SPF is on my radar screen (and has been for a > > while). > > Have you read this? > http://www.apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html > > klint. This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite Rock Solid Software (tm)
