Satish ji ... thank you very much for the information. NPGS / GRIN and KEW are best suited for me !!!
Regards. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, satish pardeshi <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello Dinesh Ji > i say that Cassia is preffered over Senna > please visit following link > http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?9339 > > it is the rules and articles of ICBN-International code of Botanical > Nomenclature that decides the accepted names of a genus or a species > or a family. > there are many articles of the code and the plant name which is > validly published as on 1 may 1753 were considered valid and correct. > however there were many ammendements done the outsoming were mentioned > as code. > the latest of which is Vienna 2005. > if a plant name or a genus is (not validly) published then that the > later name of the same plant or the genus which is validly published > (at an later date) is given priority over the previously not validly > published name. thats why we have two or more names of same plants. > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Code_of_Botanical_Nomenclature > http://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/default.htm > http://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/SaintLouis/0000St.Luistitle.htm > > regards > Satish Pardeshi > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Dinesh Valke<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Many thanks, Satish ji, for validating the ID and providing its > specifics. > > Current accepted name would be Senna surattensis (as Tabish has already > > pointed earlier in this thread). > > > > How do we follow current accepted names in India ? > > Is there any body in India which regulates / maintains such information > and > > knowledge ? > > If there is, does it imply that there would be chance that a species is > > known by different names across the world, at any given time ? > > > > Please respond only at your leisure. > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Pardeshi S. <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello all > >> it is > >> Cassia glauca Lamk., Encyclop. Meth. Bot. 1: 647, 1785; Baker in > >> Hook.f., Fl. Brit. Ind. 2: 265, 1879; Cooke, Fl. Pres. Bombay 1: 453, > >> 1958 (Repr.); Almeida, Fl. Mah. 2: 179, 1998. > >> Synonyms: Senna sulphurea (DC. ex Collard) Irwin and Barneby in Mem. > >> New York Bot. Gard. 35(1): 78, 1982; Pradhan et al, Fl. SGNP 244, > >> 2005. C. surattensis Burm. f. ssp. glauca (Lamk.) K. & S. Larsen, Fl. > >> C.L.V. 18: 102, 1980; Singh et al, Fl. Mah. St. 1: 790, 1996. C. > >> arborescens Vahl, Symb. Bot. 3: 56, 1794. C. sulphurea DC ex Collad. > >> Hist. Nat. Med. Casses 84, 1816. Robinia javanica Burm. f. Fl. Ind. > >> 163, 1768 (non C. javanica L., 1753). Senna arborescens Roxb. Fl. Ind. > >> 2: 345, 1832. C. fastigiata Vahl. Symb. 3: 57, 1974. > >> Common names: Karud, Motha-tarved. > >> > >> C. surattensis is a synonym of C. glauca. > >> the pod with a beak at the other end is one of a diagnosing character > >> very important diagnosing character is ALL 10 STAMENS ARE FERTILE. > >> stalked glands present on the rachis at lowermost 2-3 pairs of > >> leaflets > >> > >> i hope this may clear the doubts abt ID. > >> > >> Regards > >> Satish Pardeshi > >> > >> On Sep 3, 7:29 am, Nayan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Sorry Gurcharan Singh ji, troubling you, in the other thread of the > same > >> > topic i came to know that new name of Cassia glauca is Senna > surattensis, > >> > my confusion is now clear. > >> > thanks > >> > N.S.Dungriyal IFS > >> > Chief Conservator of Forests > >> > and Field Director > >> > Satpura Tiger Reserve Hoshangabad > >> > M.P. > >> > 09424792100 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > >> > From: Nayan Singh <[email protected]> > >> > To: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > Cc: indiantreepix <[email protected]> > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 September, 2009 7:22:22 AM > >> > Subject: Re: [indiantreepix:17454] Re: ... Cassia ¿ species ? > >> > > >> > Gurcharan ji yesterday i id it as Cassia glauca, but some how it is > >> > missing in the thread, what do you think about my this wild guess? > >> > thanks > >> > N.S.Dungriyal IFS > >> > Chief Conservator of Forests > >> > and Field Director > >> > Satpura Tiger Reserve Hoshangabad > >> > M.P. > >> > 09424792100 > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> > >> > To: Yazdy Palia <[email protected]>; Kenneth Greby > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > Cc: Indian Tree Pix <[email protected]>; Dinesh Valke > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 September, 2009 12:19:53 AM > >> > Subject: [indiantreepix:17454] Re: ... Cassia ¿ species ? > >> > > >> > Not Cassia fistula atleast which has distinctive cylindrical long > pods. > >> > This > >> > one seems more probably C. surratensis, the only thing that looks > >> > different > >> > to me is the thin long stalk of pod. The specimens in our garden don't > >> > have > >> > such long stalks. Leaves and flowers resemble. > >> > > >> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > >> > Associate Professor > >> > SGTB Khalsa College > >> > University of Delhi, Delhi > >> > Indiahttp://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45 > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Yazdy Palia" <[email protected]> > >> > To: "Kenneth Greby" <[email protected]> > >> > Cc: "Indian Tree Pix" <[email protected]>; "Dinesh > Valke" > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:11 PM > >> > Subject: [indiantreepix:17443] Re: ... Cassia ¿ species ? > >> > > >> > Hello friends, > >> > could it be cassia fistula? Please check > >> > uphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Shower_Tree > >> > Regards > >> > Yazdy. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Kenneth Greby<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > Dinesh-- > >> > > >> > > I don't believe that this is Senna spectabilis (Syn S. excelsa, S. > >> > > carnaval) due to the flattened seedpods. S. spectabilis has roundish > >> > > to > >> > > squared (in cross-section) pods with some muscilage present. > >> > > >> > > This looks closer to S. surattensis, but I am not positive of that > ID. > >> > > >> > > Regards-- > >> > > Ken Greby. > >> > > >> > > --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > From: Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> > >> > > Subject: [indiantreepix:17425] ... Cassia ¿ species ? > >> > > To: "Indian Tree Pix" <[email protected]> > >> > > Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 11:20 AM > >> > > >> > > Hello friends, > >> > > >> > > A large shrub of Cassia planted along an avenue near Yeoor Hills, > >> > > photos > >> > > taken on 22 AUG 09. > >> > > >> > > My friend Ajinkya Gadave has already commented in Flickr about this > >> > > plant > >> > > to > >> > > be Cassia spectabilis. > >> > > Please validate ID. > >> > > >> > > Regards. > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and > more. > >> > Click here. > >> > > >> > See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. > >> > Check out Yahoo! Buzz.http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/- Hide quoted text - > >> > > >> > - Show quoted text - > >> > >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
