Hi,
 My apologies. The third link was supposed to be this :
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Ultramarine$20Flycatcher$20Neil$20Soares%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:true/indiantreepix/9qv7OFUnUzc/oOCoTT8fmOUJ
 
                                With regards,
                                  Neil Soares.

From: Neil Soares <[email protected]>
To: efloraofindia <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 6:34 PM
Subject: [efloraofindia:179764] Bridelia spinosa



Hi,
  For many years have faced the dilemma on how to differentiate between 
B.squamosa & B.spinosa. Most reference books are pretty ambiguous. Dr.Almeida's 
'Flora of Maharashtra'  mentions that in the former the bark is yellowish and 
the drupes fleshy and presumably greenish with a yellowish tinge, whereas in 
the latter the bark is greyish and the drupes purplish-black. 



I believe I have the problem licked.




B.spinosa differs from B.squamosa in having smaller, narrower and more pointed 
leaves.

Have not encountered B.spinosa in / around Bombay or at Shahapur. 

The tree is well showcased at Khandala and Lonavala. Sending a few photographs.



My previous posts at these links are therefore erroneous :

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Bridelia$20squamosa$20Neil$20Soares%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:true/indiantreepix/Oupy57ArXmk/3zVyjiE9pewJ

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Bridelia$20squamosa$20Neil$20Soares%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:true/indiantreepix/WsoN77-a294/P-Eq821tl_wJ

https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/attach/e5981f3f4da8e0a0/Bridelia%20spinosa%20%5BAsana%5D%20drupes%202.jpg?part=5&authuser=0&view=1

My apologies to H.S. for this :

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Bridelia$20squamosa$20Neil$20Soares%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:true/indiantreepix/WmxQrvpKXHw/7RLlpEv1bpEJ

Inadventently got it right at this link, but this was also photographed at 
Khandala :

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Bridelia$20squamosa$20Neil$20Soares%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:true/indiantreepix/BAn29z9TkuY/WuLOYwqRbLUJ

Also therefore feel that Dinesh Valke's recent post of a tree at ? Yeoor ? 
Thane was also way off the mark.

                           With regards,
                             Neil Soares.

P.S. Please also check my next 2 posts.                    








-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to