Muthu ji
Your two sets of plants seem to be the same E. antiquorum , only the matter
of older and younger branches: All have distinctly 3-winged stems with
straight wings.

Rashida ji your first three plants are E. antiquorum without any doubt, but
there is no reason to confuse the fourth photograph. It is without any wings
and with spines which are spirally arranged. It should be E. neriifolia.
This  key from Flora of China should help in separating often confused
species


   4 
(3)<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=112355#KEY-1-3>Stems
± terete, leaves inserted on spirally arranged tubercles, spine shield
widely separated. 29 *E.
neriifolia*<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242321485>
+Stems winged or ribbed, leaves arranged along ribs, spines shields often ±
contiguous 
(5)<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=112355#KEY-1-5>
    5 
(4)<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=112355#KEY-1-4>Stem
3(or 4)-winged, wings thin and irregularly dentate, 1-2 cm wide. 30 *E.
antiquorum*<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=220005106>
+Stem 5-7-angular, angles impressed and flat, irregularly repand-dentate.

                                            31 *E.
royleana<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242321511>
*
*
*
* <http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242321511>**
-- 
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ *


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:

> Just wanted to add. Euphorbia is a very big group and one most
> interesting thing is, the genus Euphorbia has two type species,
> Euphorbia antiquorum and Euphirbia serrata. I never heard a genus with
> two types before. If anyone else knows then please do add to our
> information.
> Kew has a list of around over 5000 names of which only ~2000 names are
> accepted. That itself depicts the taxonomic complications here.
> Regards
> Pankaj
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Dear Muthu
> > Here is the lectotype of Euphorbia antiquorum L.
> > Lectotype : Herb. Clifford: 196, Euphorbia 1 (BM-000628669)
> > Designated by: Wijnands in Bot. Commelins : 97 (1983)
> > You can clearly make out which is the real Euphorbia antiquorum.
> >
> > There is another species called Euphorbia royleana. Kindly check your
> > plant with that description. I am not sure if this plant is found in
> > South India but it is supposed to be widespread from Pakistan to
> > Taiwan. I assume I have seen it in Uttarakhand as well as Rajasthan.
> >
> > Regards
> > Pankaj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dr  Pankaj Kumar
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Muthu Karthick <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Feb 15, 12:08 pm
> >> Subject: thorny Euphorbia sp.
> >> To: efloraofindia
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >> These plants are from the same locality. Kindly excuse me for mixing
> >> two
> >> species(?) in the same post. Please guide me in this morphology of *
> >> Euphorbia* spp.
> >>
> >> The previous plant posted have straight grooves and not that of *E.
> >> antiquorum*. Is this any physical variation or totally the species is
> >> different?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Muthu Karthick <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Thank you all, and Pardeshiji cleared my doubt on inflorescence colour.
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Usha Desai <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> E. antqourum....nice picture of Praying mantis in the last
> picture,preying
> >>>> for prey[?]
> >>>> Thanks for sharing.E antquorum is flowering all over Mumbai.
> >>>> Usha Desai
> >>
> >>>> On 1 February 2011 20:11, tanay bose <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> *Euphorbia antiquorum*
> >>>>> ***Tanay
> >>>>> *
> >>
> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Pardeshi S. <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>> the young inflorescence appears green. once the ivary is formed it
> >>>>>> would impart the reddish/ purplish tone.
> >>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Satish Pardeshi
> >>
> >>>>>> On Feb 1, 4:31 pm, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> > Muthu ji
> >>>>>> > I would go with E. antiquurum, because the angles are distinctly
> >>>>>> 3-winged,
> >>>>>> > the wings are running almost straight. In E. tortilis the angles
> are
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>> > that promently winged, they are lobulate with stout paired spines
> on
> >>>>>> lobes,
> >>>>>> > and most importantly the angles are spirally twisted like we have
> in
> >>>>>> E.
> >>>>>> > neriifolia where of course the angles are not that prominents, and
> >>>>>> there are
> >>>>>> > 5 spiral rows.
> >>
> >>>>>> > --
> >>>>>> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> >>>>>> > Retired  Associate Professor
> >>>>>> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> >>>>>> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> >>>>>> > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
> >>
> >>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Muthu Karthick <[email protected]
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > > Dear all,
> >>>>>> > > descriptions match this thorny shrub as *Euphorbia antiquorum*.
> I
> >>>>>> suspect
> >>>>>> > > this to be a different species owing to the colour of flowers.
> >>>>>> Please
> >>>>>> > > help to solve this.
> >>>>>> > > Could this be *E. tortilis*?
> >>
> >>>>>> > > Location: Sathyamangalam wls; 300 msl
> >>>>>> > > Date: 15 Dec 2010
> >>
> >>>>>> > > --
> >>>>>> > > Muthu Karthick, N
> >>>>>> > > Junior Research Fellow
> >>>>>> > > Care Earth Trust
> >>>>>> > > #15, second main road,
> >>>>>> > > Thillai ganga nagar,
> >>>>>> > > Chennai - 600 061
> >>>>>> > > Mob: 09626833911
> >>>>>> > >www.careearthtrust.org
> >>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> *Tanay Bose*
> >>>>> Research Assistant & Teaching Assistant.
> >>>>> Department of Botany.
> >>>>> University of British Columbia .
> >>>>> 3529-6270 University Blvd.
> >>>>> Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 (Canada)
> >>>>> Phone: 778-323-4036 (Mobile)
> >>>>>            604-822-2019 (Lab)
> >>>>>            604-822-6089  (Fax)
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> *Webpages:*
> >>>>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/mberbee.html
> >>>>>http://www.botany.ubc.ca/people/gradstud.html
> >>>>>https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Muthu Karthick, N
> >>> Junior Research Fellow
> >>> Care Earth Trust
> >>> #15, second main road,
> >>> Thillai ganga nagar,
> >>> Chennai - 600 061
> >>> Mob: 09626833911
> >>>www.careearthtrust.org
> >>
> >> --
> >> Muthu Karthick, N
> >> Care Earth Trust
> >> #15, second main road,
> >> Thillai ganga nagar,
> >> Chennai - 600 061
> >> Mob: 0091 96268 33911www.careearthtrust.org
> >>
> >>  360.gif
> >> < 1KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  E antiquorum (3).jpg
> >> 193KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  a 599.jpg
> >> 142KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  a 600.jpg
> >> 149KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  b 235.jpg
> >> 193KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  b 236.jpg
> >> 237KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  b 237.jpg
> >> 179KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  E antiquorum.jpg
> >> 206KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  E antiquorum (1).jpg
> >> 212KViewDownload
> >>
> >>  E antiquorum (2).jpg
> >> 210KViewDownload
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ***********************************************
> > "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
> >
> >
> > Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> > Research Associate
> > Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
> > Department of Habitat Ecology
> > Wildlife Institute of India
> > Post Box # 18
> > Dehradun - 248001, India
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ***********************************************
> "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!"
>
>
> Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae)
> Research Associate
> Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project
> Department of Habitat Ecology
> Wildlife Institute of India
> Post Box # 18
> Dehradun - 248001, India
>

Reply via email to