There is another: *Bridelia hamiltoniana* Wall. ex Müll.Arg. (synonym of *Bridelia montana*(Roxb.) Willd.)
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Brideliahamiltoniana&w=91314344%40N00&m=tags Regards. Dinesh On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, In Maharashtra we see two Bridelia (tree) species one is Bridelia > spinosa (Roxb.) Willd. (plant stems with spines, dioecious flower) and other > one is Bridelia squamosa (Lamk.) Gehrm. (Plant without spines, monoecious > flower) > > please anyone clarify this!!!!! > > regards, > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Flora Malesiana, Dressler, Euphorbiaceae, treats both species (B. >> squamosa (Lehm.) Gehrm. and B. spinosa (Roxb.) Willd.) as synonyms of B. >> retusa (L.) A. Juss. Obviously they are same species. Flora Malesiana is one >> publication which can't be easily ignored. >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> the plant list put B. squamosa as synonym and B. spinosa synonym of B. >>> retusa... >>> >>> anyone pls clarify.. or we consider this all as one species following >>> the plant list... >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Giby Kuriakose <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> According to "the plant list" *Bridelia spinosa* (Roxb.) Willd. is a >>>> synonym of *Bridelia* *retusa* (L.) A.Juss. >>>> http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-24616 >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Giby >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30 September 2011 22:50, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> It is now called Bridelia spinosa. My trees are also flowering. >>>>> Sending a few of my photographs. >>>>> With regards, >>>>> Neil Soares. >>>>> >>>>> --- On *Fri, 9/30/11, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>* wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Satish Phadke <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:85014] ID 300911 >>>>> To: "Bhatt Sweta" <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: "indiantreepix" <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Friday, September 30, 2011, 4:36 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The tiny flowers of this tree are really beautiful. I diagnose the >>>>> plant by looking at the leaf which is very characteristic and unmistakable >>>>> even from a distance. >>>>> It is thick; leathery; the veins or nerves( I don't know what to call >>>>> them correctly) are clear prominent and perfectly parallel originating >>>>> from >>>>> the mid vein. Of course the shape is important and the area of occurrence. >>>>> Attaching some flowers captured recently in last fortnight from Mhatoba >>>>> Tekdi Kothrud. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Bhatt Sweta >>>>> <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Location Mumbai >>>>> Flowering >>>>> Date - September, 2011 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Bhatt Shweta* >>>>> *Doctoral Research Student,* >>>>> M.S.U. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD >>>> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), >>>> Royal Enclave, >>>> Jakkur Post, Srirampura >>>> Bangalore- 560064 >>>> India >>>> Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) >>>> visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - H.S. >>> >>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart >>> of stone >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > - H.S. > > A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of > stone > >
