Cassia absus never come in Single flower regards,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Friends > To me it again appears to be a case where we are discussing the identity of > a plant without considering authority. > It also highlights the fact that many of us give our decisions without > trying to justify our decision or negate others' conclusion > > Let me first point out that there is no accepted name such as Chamaecrista > uniflora, nor any accepted species name Cassia uniflora > > Now coming back to Cassia uniflora, there are two taxa by that name > > 1. Cassia uniflora Mill., characterised by 5-9 leaflets, flowers 2-6 > together. This is now correctly known as > *Senna* *uniflora* (Mill.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby > http://achutha.net/WeedWatch.html > > > 2. Senna uniflora Spreng., a very distinct plant with four leaflets > arranged like a cross and with single flower. this is now correctly known > as > *Chamaecrista* *ramosa* (Vogel) H.S.Irwin & Barneby > http://floredeguyane.piwigo.com/index?/category/28-chamaecrista_ramosa > > I think Vijayasankar ji is correct in saying that Senna uniflora is the > plant already discussed on our website for which he has provided the link. > > And till we find a better choice, the best match is still Cassia absus L. > now correctly known as > *Chamaecrista* *absus* (L.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> all are C. uniflora >> >> regards, >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Vijayasankar <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Agree with Rajdeo ji, it is not Cassia absus. If it is C. uniflora, then >>> the correct genus is Senna (S. uniflora), but to me it doesn't look like S. >>> uniflora either. Pl c this link >>> https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/669102a1420b541f?fwc=1&hl=en >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Vijayasankar Raman >>> National Center for Natural Products Research >>> University of Mississippi >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:37 AM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Correct genus for this plant is Chamaecrista >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, rajdeo singh >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Satish ji, >>>>> This is not Cassia absus, >>>>> its Cassia uniflora. >>>>> >>>>> *** >>>>> Rajdeo Singh >>>>> Project fellow >>>>> St. Xavier's College, >>>>> Mumbai >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> - H.S. >>>> >>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart >>>> of stone >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> - H.S. >> >> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of >> stone >> >> > > > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
