Thanks Vijay ji for sharing this,, but even i know that Sirji will not agree with this..
thanks, On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear all, > > We all know that Flora of China (FoC) is one of the most trusted efloras, > and most of the time a ready reference for identifying our Indian plants, > too. > It treats *Murraya paniculata* and *M. exotica* as different species. We > knew this based on our field experience. > The differences, as per FoC are: [ > http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=121339] > > Leaflet blades mostly suborbicular to ovate to elliptic, 1.5-6 cm wide* > M. paniculata* > Leaflet blades elliptic-obovate or obovate, 0.5-3 cm > wide *M. exotica* > > These may appear to be variable characters if we refer only herbarium > specimens. > Some taxa for e.g. Flacourtia indica & F. romantchii, we know they are > different based on their differences in habit, ecology etc., but its hard to > find strong characters to distinguish them convincingly. > > Regards > > Vijayasankar Raman > National Center for Natural Products Research > University of Mississippi > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Nothing can help one who does not want to see reason. Who can stop me if I >> insist on believing that whole taxonomic World is wrong. Let those who want >> to live in their World be so. >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:06 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> If plant is different surely they will have some differences i guess... >>> >>> I think every one will agree that M. paniculata present in the wild as >>> well as in cultivation whereas M. exotica or M. paniculata var. exotica or >>> cv of M. paniculata whatever we say its commonly cultivated in the garden >>> for the glossy laeves and beautiful flowers.. if its cv than who had made >>> it???? no doubt they are different and in Maharashtra both can seen very >>> commonly,, those who eager to see the species can visit Amboli, >>> Mahabaleshwar, Mathera, Pune, Bhimashankar etc places to see M. paniculata >>> and M. exotica in Nashik garden, Mumbai (Rani baug, Bombay trust garden, >>> Gorai, Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Plantation near pond,, etc etc..), >>> Kolhapur, Pune garden.. etc etc. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Mahadeswara ji >>>> For that that matter all species which have been described on the basis >>>> of different holotypes would be different species, because they will have >>>> some differences. If we have that concept there would be no heterotypic >>>> synonyms and we will have more than 5 lac species of angiosperms on this >>>> Earth, whereas most authors agree on this number being below 3 lacs. As I >>>> have written earlier also Hortus Third (considered Bible for cultivated >>>> plants), The Plant List, now even GRIN, and numerous other publications >>>> treat them as synonyms, and we would be doing little service to ignore >>>> them. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Mahadeswara <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with Vijayasankar ji and H.S.ji. Both are different >>>>> species. Both these species are available in IIT Madras Campus and >>>>> C L R I Campus, Adyar Chennai. While the M. paniculata is wild, >>>>> M.exotica is cultivated. In photograph both the plants look like. >>>>> Unfortunately, I am not in Chennai now. I had the photographs of >>>>> both. I will try to dig out from the archives in due course and post >>>>> it to the group (depends on getting the photographs) >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 26, 6:40 am, Balkar Arya <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Dear All >>>>> > *Murraya paniculata* >>>>> > *Family Rutaceae >>>>> > * >>>>> > *From Garden of PIET Campus Samalkha Panipat >>>>> > *-- >>>>> > Regards >>>>> > >>>>> > Dr Balkar Singh >>>>> > Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>> > Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>> > Haryana-132103 >>>>> > 09416262964 >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (1).JPG >>>>> > 175KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (2).JPG >>>>> > 258KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (3).JPG >>>>> > 240KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (4).JPG >>>>> > 180KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (5).JPG >>>>> > 214KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (6).JPG >>>>> > 186KViewDownload >>>>> > >>>>> > Murraya paniculata (7).JPG >>>>> > 201KViewDownload >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - H.S. >>> >>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart >>> of stone >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
