<https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#%21forum/indiantreepix>Thread
 
identification: 
   Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. 


On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:41:54 PM UTC+10, JM Garg wrote:
>
> Thanks, Mic,
> Actually nothing is in our control as far as technical part of Google 
> groups (efloraofindia is part of it) is concerned.
> We having using it for almost 5 years & are well conversant with its 
> working now. 
>  
> As far as getting replies to ones' post is concerned, it is sometimes very 
> difficult because of voluntary nature of replies. Lot of resurfacing, 
> thought, hard work etc. is required to get proper responses.
>  
> Thank you message are also very important for lot of members to feel some 
> satisfaction & continue posting, though it can be sent only to the poster.  
>  
> Regarding "*2 of the people replying to my posts and I have experienced 
> the disappearance of messages or replies to messages*.", pl. let me know 
> about which threads you are talking.
>
>
>  
> On 22 May 2012 04:11, OZmic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear all, 
>> 2 of the people replying to my posts and I have experienced the 
>> disappearance of messages or replies to messages.
>> I lack experience and am not yet familiar with this forum but I think 
>> there could be a little "twicking" to improve the functioning. Normally one 
>> sends an e-mail, an answer comes back on top of the original, one answers 
>> back and so on. The original is there in the string only once at the 
>> bottom. The very last comment is on the top.
>>
>>  Instead on the list of postings it seems that we carry a lot of info 
>> around and really all there is new to read is "thanks" or "by the way I 
>> thought of ..." leading to a new topic altogether.
>> Would it be more practical to initiate a topic, then exchange e-mails one 
>> to one or one to -say- 5 respondents. Once the discussion is completed we 
>> post the result on the forum. This would be mainly for text. Photos may 
>> introduce extra complications. With this process one would retain control 
>> of what is send / displayed and it would answer Usha di's concern of lost 
>> of control. I presume it would also lighten the load on the server and 
>> would result in a smoother presentation on line. What do you think?
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged 
> alphabetically & place-wise): 
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use 
> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, 
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group: 
> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1860 members & 
> 1,15,000 messages on 30/4/12) or Efloraofindia website: 
> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database 
> of more than 6500 species).
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of 
> India'. 
>
>

Reply via email to