Possibly stated messages not posted. On 22 May 2012 13:12, OZmic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#%21forum/indiantreepix>Thread > identification: > Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. > > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:41:54 PM UTC+10, JM Garg wrote: >> >> Thanks, Mic, >> Actually nothing is in our control as far as technical part of Google >> groups (efloraofindia is part of it) is concerned. >> We having using it for almost 5 years & are well conversant with its >> working now. >> >> As far as getting replies to ones' post is concerned, it is sometimes >> very difficult because of voluntary nature of replies. Lot of resurfacing, >> thought, hard work etc. is required to get proper responses. >> >> Thank you message are also very important for lot of members to feel some >> satisfaction & continue posting, though it can be sent only to the poster. >> >> Regarding "*2 of the people replying to my posts and I have experienced >> the disappearance of messages or replies to messages*.", pl. let me know >> about which threads you are talking. >> >> >> >> On 22 May 2012 04:11, OZmic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> 2 of the people replying to my posts and I have experienced the >>> disappearance of messages or replies to messages. >>> I lack experience and am not yet familiar with this forum but I think >>> there could be a little "twicking" to improve the functioning. Normally one >>> sends an e-mail, an answer comes back on top of the original, one answers >>> back and so on. The original is there in the string only once at the >>> bottom. The very last comment is on the top. >>> >>> Instead on the list of postings it seems that we carry a lot of info >>> around and really all there is new to read is "thanks" or "by the way I >>> thought of ..." leading to a new topic altogether. >>> Would it be more practical to initiate a topic, then exchange e-mails >>> one to one or one to -say- 5 respondents. Once the discussion is completed >>> we post the result on the forum. This would be mainly for text. Photos may >>> introduce extra complications. With this process one would retain control >>> of what is send / displayed and it would answer Usha di's concern of lost >>> of control. I presume it would also lighten the load on the server and >>> would result in a smoother presentation on line. What do you think? >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**User:Jmgarg1<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& >> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged >> alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/** >> wiki/Category:J.M.Garg<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg>. >> You >> can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with >> each image. >> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, >> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group: >> http://groups.google.co.in/**group/indiantreepix<http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix>(more >> than 1860 members & 1,15,000 messages on 30/4/12) or Efloraofindia >> website: >> https://sites.google.com/site/**efloraofindia/<https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> >> (with >> a species database of more than 6500 species). >> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of >> India'. >> >> -- With regards, J.M.Garg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species* & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image. For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group: http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1860 members & 1,15,000 messages on 30/4/12) or Efloraofindia website: https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database of more than 6500 species). Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.
