On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 10:16:27 PM UTC+2, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Sean Beckett wrote: > >> >> >> COUNT() is valid, but you are comparing the number of points in one >> database vs. the number of points written to the entire instance. If you >> run SHOW DATABASES you can see what other databases are on the system and >> contributing to the pointReq number. >> > > Aha, that's what you meant. The shard info includes all data, also of the > internal administration, and because of the every 10s thing, it'll always > grow. And I can't really split it out per database. Correct? > > Is this something that could be reasonably be done by an continuous query? > The count(*) takes about 12 secs, it's OK if it's a little behind, but I'd > rather not have the monitoring UI hang for 12 secs when the user requests > the value. > > a summation of fieldsCreate + writePointsOk seems to get close... is that just a coincedence?
-- Remember to include the InfluxDB version number with all issue reports --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InfluxDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/influxdb. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/influxdb/89045c2c-9118-4a4d-b160-d932d73e859e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
