> I don't think making a change like this *simply* so that `ls /afs' > doesn't take a long time, is warranted. It looks like another abuse > of symlinks. I'm not sure it's warranted either, but we have found that on some Linux systems the side effects of 'ls /afs' are worse -- it completely locks up all AFS access for all users on the system. We've been able to systematically duplicate this on RedHat 6.x machines (but not on 5.x). Our current "solution" is to limit the entries in CellServDB to sites that we regularly access and hope that nobody ever needs to visit an unlisted cell. Chris
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs"... Noel Hunt
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls ... Ken Hornstein
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to &... Ken Hornstein
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to &... John M. Lockard
- Re: root.othercells - a solution... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "... Jimmy Engelbrecht
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "... Russ Allbery
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Christopher Lindsey
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Terry McCoy
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs"... Noel Hunt
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs"... luan
- RE: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs"... Glew, Andy
