>I do not understand how you can characterize this >as "another abuse of symblinks"? > >How, exactly, does one use symbolic links in a non-abusive way? I always thought that symbolic links were kinda like salt ... good when used appropriately, but using them too much will kill you in the long run. It always seemed to me that the right solution was to change the cache manager so that a stat() of a mountpoint in /afs didn't cause you to contact that cell. There's was even some code that was #ifdef'd out in the cache manager that claimed to do that (but it was for NeXTStep, so I suspect that it hasn't been maintained :-) ). --Ken
- root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs" ta... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Terry McCoy
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls ... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Noel Hunt
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls ... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "... Ken Hornstein
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to &... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution... Ken Hornstein
- Re: root.othercells - a solution... John M. Lockard
- Re: root.othercells - a solu... Paul Blackburn
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to &... Jimmy Engelbrecht
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to &... Russ Allbery
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls ... Christopher Lindsey
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls ... Terry McCoy
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... Noel Hunt
- Re: root.othercells - a solution to "ls /afs... luan
