Stephen Cameron wrote:
> Well, guess what... You just converted "branchtag" from being
> a branch tag into being a regular tag. Not only that,
> but now you have NO idea what revision "branchtag" used
> to point to, and no way to find out, so you can't even
> undo it.
Of course this could be interpreted as a feature :-) by using it in
those cases where a branch is truly dead and should never be revived.
In several "flying-fish" style patterns branches are orphaned fairly
frequently; I've been looking for a way to orphan them permanently
(knowing full well what that entails).
Cheers,
Laird
