Laird Nelson wrote: >In several "flying-fish" style patterns branches are orphaned fairly >frequently; I've been looking for a way to orphan them permanently >(knowing full well what that entails). > I've seen this "flying-fish" reference several times on this list. What does it mean? -- Stephen Rasku E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Engineer Web: http://www.tgivan.com/ TGI Technologies http://www.pop-star.net/
- cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches vs. keyword ... Stephen Cameron
- Re: cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches vs.... Stephen Rasku
- Re: cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches vs.... Stephen Cameron
- Re: cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches... Laird Nelson
- Re: cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches vs.... Stephen Rasku
- Re: cvs tag -F and branch tags, (was Re: Branches vs.... HMahaffey
- Stephen Rasku
