* Rainer Orth (ro at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de) wrote:
> Renaud Manus writes:
> 
> > LU is part of Solaris Express but not part of OpenSolaris. Solaris
> > Express contains binaries that have not published in the OpenSolaris
> > source base (eg. Live Upgrade).
> 
> But the OpenSolaris.ORG mailing lists are the only venue for questions
> about problems with LU in SX:CE.  You cannot buy a support contract for
> SX:CE, so you're stuck with LU if you either cannot (sun4u pre-wanboot) or
> don't want to run Indiana.
> 
> At least in the case of LU with ZFS root, several people have received
> helpful answers over on zfs-discuss, and I'd expect (or at least hope for)
> the same for generic questions (not related to S10, of course) here on
> install-discuss.

Sure, however the original query was about LU in Solaris 10.  There are
far more effective avenues to resolve issues found in Solaris 10 than
posting on OpenSolaris forums/lists.  Even more so if you have a valid
support contract.  That's all I was trying to point out.

While it's true that someone *may* get an answer on this list/forum
about LU (or some other OpenSolaris forum/list), it's by no means
guaranteed since LU is off-topic for OpenSolaris because LU is *not*
open.  I personally believe in trying to point people in directions that
have greater chances of actually producing a solution.  Posting on these
lists about LU (or any non-open technology that's in SXCE) or Solaris 10
issues isn't at the top of the list of ways to effectively produce a
solution to those problems.

I didn't say anyone couldn't post these sorts of issues, by all means
feel free.  As long as your expectation is set appropriately, which is
that you may or may not actually get anything useful by doing so because
S10 issues are off-topic and issues about non-open technology such as LU
are as well.  Just trying to be helpful, that's all.

Cheers,

-- 
Glenn

Reply via email to