Michael Ramchand wrote: > Uwe Dippel wrote: >> It can't be really safe, because the old BE is modified. >> > What is your understanding of how the old BE is "modified"? Is there > more than what I pointed out on the original e-mail. If not, then my > original statement is accurate. If not, then I'd like to be educated how > else LU affects the original BE.
Count me in. I never saw LU modify my old BE other than mentioned by Michael. And that was on UFS. Nowadays on ZFS LU is absolutely great. On UFS it not always booted OK (but that was partly because I have some zones running. I -ALWAYS- could boot back to the "old" BE. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE +http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u6 10/08 ZFS+
