On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:59:10PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:58:25 -0600 > Jim Faut <Jim.Faut at Sun.COM> wrote: > > If I get up the courage again, I'll probably try the LU process again > > with my ZFS configuration instead of SVM. > > You certainly will. LU on ZFS is not comparable with LU on UFS. > LU on ZFS works like a charm and and like a breeze. > It's just a matter of seconds. ;-)
Hello? Every version/patch of LU introduces new bugs. Without self-patching the scripts it may even happen, that a ludelete destroys ZFS as soon as zones come into play ... Regards, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 67 12768
