On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:

> On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:26, Wesley Eddy wrote:
>> On 7/9/2012 4:41 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
>>> The TCP option is another good way to include the HOST ID in case of TCP
>>> and UDP communications. 
>> 
>> Surely there's a typo there, since it does not work at all in the
>> case of UDP.
>> 
>> I disagree with the overall recommendation of the document, since
>> it presumes that a solution is required, among other flaws with it.
>> 
>> Additionally, it is not particularly clear how this can work for
>> multiple layers of sharing (e.g. CGN), though draft-abdo seems to
>> think that CGN is a single layer of sharing.
> 
> +1

<aol>Me too!</aol>

Existing "solutions" work well enough (even if in many cases the solution 
simply ignores the problem :-P)

W

> 
> Lars_______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

--
The duke had a mind that ticked like a clock and, like a clock, it regularly 
went cuckoo.

    -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters)


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to