On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:26, Wesley Eddy wrote: >> On 7/9/2012 4:41 PM, Tina TSOU wrote: >>> The TCP option is another good way to include the HOST ID in case of TCP >>> and UDP communications. >> >> Surely there's a typo there, since it does not work at all in the >> case of UDP. >> >> I disagree with the overall recommendation of the document, since >> it presumes that a solution is required, among other flaws with it. >> >> Additionally, it is not particularly clear how this can work for >> multiple layers of sharing (e.g. CGN), though draft-abdo seems to >> think that CGN is a single layer of sharing. > > +1
<aol>Me too!</aol> Existing "solutions" work well enough (even if in many cases the solution simply ignores the problem :-P) W > > Lars_______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -- The duke had a mind that ticked like a clock and, like a clock, it regularly went cuckoo. -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area