On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:25 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: > Dear Suresh, all, > > After reading received comments, the major point we need to discuss is > whether the WG wants to remove Section 3.3 or maintain it. I'm waiting for a > feedback from the WG for the direction to take. I will implement any change > requested by the WG. >
Section 3.3 seems to give preference to one specific solution, as such it is against the whole spirit of this document. I suggest removing it. Behcet > Cheers, > Med > > >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : int-area-boun...@ietf.org >>[mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Suresh Krishnan >>Envoyé : vendredi 20 juillet 2012 20:56 >>À : Internet Area >>Objet : [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for >>draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 >> >>Hi all, >> After going through the responses to the WGLC, it is clear that the >>draft is not ready to go forward in the publication process. We will >>discuss further steps for this draft at the Vancouver meeting. >> >>Thanks >>Suresh & Julien >>_______________________________________________ >>Int-area mailing list >>Int-area@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >> > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
