On 7/26/2012 1:08 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:25 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: >> Dear Suresh, all, >> >> After reading received comments, the major point we need to discuss is >> whether the WG wants to remove Section 3.3 or maintain it. I'm waiting for a >> feedback from the WG for the direction to take. I will implement any change >> requested by the WG. >> > > Section 3.3 seems to give preference to one specific solution, as such > it is against the whole spirit of this document. > > I suggest removing it. >
+1 In fact, I suggest that the draft should clearly say that it's doubtful whether a solution actually *needs* to be identified and recommended, especially ones that are implemented awkwardly in other layers. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
