> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Brim [mailto:scott.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 8:02 AM > To: Joe Touch > Cc: Dan Wing; Internet Area; Behcet Sarikaya > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call for > draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Touch <to...@isi.edu> wrote: > > > > On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Dan Wing wrote: > > > >> ... > >> During the INTAREA presentation, one suggestion I heard was > >> a separate protocol (ident-like). I will submit an I-D towards > >> that end, which I am dusting off from 2010 when I first > >> considered ident and discarded it for a variety of reasons. > >> > >> Do you have additional suggestions on how to accomplish convey > >> an identifer? > > > > > > There are two separate problems: > > > > - establishing an identity and pairing it with a tag > > > > - getting that tag into connections so each connection can be > correlated back to the identity > > 3) making sure that not everyone can associate the identity with that > tag.
Scott, Today's Internet users, which are not sharing addresses with other users, are sending an uniquely-identifyable identifier to every Internet server they use: their unique IP address. -d _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
