Hello,
The call is now over and there's been a good discussion on the list. Even
though there is clearly no rough consensus to get the document adopted by the
WG, many interesting points have been made.
More than the details about what/where/when/how/for-how-long to log, the more
important question is whether IETF should say anything about this topic or not.
For this, we need to consider not only the technical details, but also the
intended audience and the potential implications that the document could have
outside the IETF.
There are three options, which could lead to different next steps:
* Should IETF say anything at all about logging?
* If yes,
* Are we ok with RFC 6302 in its current form?
* If yes: Then we have nothing else to do
* If no: Should we amend 6302?
* If no,
* Should we deprecate/make-historical 6302?
Although this is something that may need to be addressed beyond the IntArea WG,
any inputs people can provide here would be useful.
Best,
Juan Carlos & Wassim
From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juan Carlos
Zuniga
Sent: April 19, 2018 5:38 PM
To: int-area <[email protected]>
Subject: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal
Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies
Dear all,
After some discussions on the v6ops and intarea mailing lists, the author of
draft-daveor-cgn-logging is requesting its adoption by the IntArea WG.
Hence, we would like to start a WG adoption call for
draft-daveor-cgn-logging-04
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daveor-cgn-logging-04.
Please indicate your preferences/comments on the mailing list. The deadline is
May the 4th.
Best,
Juan Carlos & Wassim
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
