On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Joe Touch wrote:
I thought what was being asked was:
...
- require its support for new messages (that seems reasonable - or at least that new messages MUST describe whether this extension is supported, and SHOULD support it unless obviously interfering).
I'm not sure if an Experimental RFC could mandate the former, but I'm pretty sure folks agree that if someone from IETF defines new ICMP extensions, at some point it's valid to ask whether the proposer has read this document.
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
