> 
> The problem is that anything short of having this be standards-track
> means that future standards-track docs _need_ not consider this work at
> all. If that's not the goal, than this needs to go a different track.
> 

Jari,

Is there some requirement for PS that this document does not meet?

                                 Ron


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to