Carlos Pignataro wrote:
> Ron, Jari,
> 
> Maybe adding a small note that future ICMPs may make use of this
> extension structure if/when defined?

I thought what was being asked was:

- define use only for an explicit subset of existing ICMP messages,
i.e., for all existing, state whether MUST, MAY, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT,
MUST NOT.

- require its support for new messages (that seems reasonable - or at
least that new messages MUST describe whether this extension is
supported, and SHOULD support it unless obviously interfering).

Joe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to