Joe,
This sounds reasonable. Do we have consensus on that?
Ron
Joe Touch wrote:
>
> Carlos Pignataro wrote:
>
>>Ron, Jari,
>>
>>Maybe adding a small note that future ICMPs may make use of this
>>extension structure if/when defined?
>
>
> I thought what was being asked was:
>
> - define use only for an explicit subset of existing ICMP messages,
> i.e., for all existing, state whether MUST, MAY, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT,
> MUST NOT.
>
> - require its support for new messages (that seems reasonable - or at
> least that new messages MUST describe whether this extension is
> supported, and SHOULD support it unless obviously interfering).
>
> Joe
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
