On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:37:41AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:58:53 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > We already have trace_i915_gem_request_add in i915_add_request which is > > essentially giving out the same information (well, minus the hopefully > > correct singal_mbox reg addresses). I think we can drop this one. > > I thought that as well, but then realised that a complete set of ring > tracepoints would be useful independent of the request/object > tracepoints. > > A couple of tracepoints on the gen6 paths is insufficients. ;-)
Well, I've quickly reviewed them and I think we're mostly covered. Many of the tracepoints are called from generic code i915_gem.c right before/after calling into the chipset-specific ringbuffer functions. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
