On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:09:42 -0300, Eugeni Dodonov <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> This is one set of those registers for each pipe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 09b2267..7a9232e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3890,4 +3890,20 @@
>  #define  PIPE_DDI_PORT_WIDTH_X2                      (1<<1)
>  #define  PIPE_DDI_PORT_WIDTH_X4                      (3<<1)
>  
> +/* DisplayPort Transport Control */
> +#define DP_TP_CTL_A                  0x64040
> +#define DP_TP_CTL_B                  0x64140
> +#define DP_TP_CTL_C                  0x64240
> +#define DP_TP_CTL_D                  0x64340
> +#define DP_TP_CTL_E                  0x64440
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_ENABLE            (1<<31)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_MODE_SST  (0<<27)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_MODE_MST  (1<<27)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_ENHANCED_FRAME_ENABLE     (1<<18)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_FDI_AUTOTRAIN     (1<<15)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_MASK           (7<<8)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_PAT1           (0<<8)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_PAT2           (1<<8)
> +#define  DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_NORMAL (3<<8)

Would these not benefit from a #define DP_TP_CTL(pipe)?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to